Volume 9, Issue 1 (2-2022)                   J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2022, 9(1): 15-24 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ahmadi M, Yalfani A. Interlimb Asymmetry of Vertical Ground Reaction Force as a Risk Factor for Re-injury and Knee Osteoarthritis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2022; 9 (1) :15-24
URL: http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2196-en.html
1- Department of Corrective Exercises and Sports Injury, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 691 kb]   (372 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (869 Views)
Full-Text:   (333 Views)
1. Introduction
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is the most rampant lesion of all knee ligaments that mostly occurs non-contact [1, 2]. The annual prevalence of ACL injury in the United States is reported to be 250 000. Annually, 100 000 ACLR surgeries are reported in the US [3] any alterations in co-contraction might be a risk factor for ACL injury. The most common autografts used for ACLR are the bone-patellar tendon-bone and the semitendinosus-gracilis grafts [4]. The goal of surgery is to restore knee constancy and enhance the chances of returning to sport and activity level before the injury, which is possible 6 to 12 months after ACLR [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. 
ACL re-rupture is one of the most common problems after ACLR. Almost 30% of patients sustain an ACL re-injury within 24 months of the initial injury [10]. One of the influencing factors in ACL re-rupture is the asymmetry in the lower extremity biomechanics, which is evident 6 months after surgery [11, 12]. Studies have reported that patients who have asymmetry in biomechanical variables after ACLR are at least 3 times more susceptible to ACL re-injury [11]. Asymmetry in mechanical behavior between the right and left limbs during movement is often used to measure the effectiveness of surgical interventions and the potential risks of re-injury [13]. Although ACLR provides successful clinical outcomes, it cannot repair faulty lower limb mechanics [14]. In this regard, patients with ACLR show decreased knee flexion, extensor moment, and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) [15]. As a result, these compensatory mechanisms correlate with an increased risk of secondary ACL rupture [2, 12]. Therefore, identifying modifiable factors that predict ACL re-injury is essential to diminish the risk of re-injury and subsequent consequences [10, 11].
The inverse dynamics method is used to measure the kinetic asymmetry of the knee in patients with ACLR by measuring the motion capture and ground reaction force (GRF) [5, 7]. From the perspective of inverse dynamics, GRF is the crucial component in calculating knee kinetics [5]. As a result, the kinetic asymmetry of the knee may be predicted by GRF asymmetry [5]. Accordingly, one of the qualitative methods for evaluating the symmetry of lower limb loading is through vGRF measurement [1]. Lower limb asymmetry in patients with ACLR, which can be detected by the asymmetry between the right and left legs, is defined by the difference between the limbs of more than 10% or a symmetry index of less than 90 [1]. 
Since movement symmetry is crucial, providing a comprehensive and reliable method to achieve movement symmetry is a major concern for physicians and researchers [16]. Therefore, the lower limb loading symmetry after ACLR during rehabilitation has been considered by rehabilitation specialists [17]. The study of GRF symmetry in patients with ACLR seems important and necessary [16]. In addition, knowledge of load symmetry may be effective in developing screening methods that may diagnose the risk of ACL re-injury and compensatory strategies during unilateral and bilateral movements following ACLR [17]. Despite the above-mentioned issues, there is limited scientific documentation in the field of loading asymmetry after unilateral ACLR. 
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the inter-limb asymmetry of vGRF in patients with ACLR.

2. Methods
Study protocol

The present systematic review study has been designed and compiled following the PRISMA 2009 guidelines [18]. Since the PRISMA statement is designed for review and meta-analysis studies, we have considered articles that are only related to review studies [18]. We conducted a comprehensive search on PROSPERO that finally found a similar review study.

Search strategy
Two researchers independently used the following online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, Scopus, and MEDLINE. These databases were searched for articles from 2000 to 2022. Furthermore, the Google Scholar citation database was used as a complementary search engine. An updated search was conducted on April 01, 2022, to identify newly published articles. The PICO (population, intervention comparison, and outcome) framework was used to determine the keywords. In the present study, the PICO was defined as follows: “P” as patients with ACL rupture, “I” as ACL reconstruction, “C” as comparison with non-injured limbs, and “O” as vGRF symmetry index. For a comprehensive search, the researchers used the keywords related to the PICO index, common keywords, and MeSH terms (Table 1).

Meanwhile, the operator “OR” was used to combine the synonyms, and “AND” was used to combine the categories. 

Eligibility criteria
Two researchers independently screened the extracted studies according to the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria comprised the following items:
1: Articles published in English;
Cross-sectional studies;
Articles that have compared the vGRF symmetry index between non-surgical and surgical limbs in patients with ACLR;
Sample size of studies related to active people and athletes;
The sample size does not have upper and lower limb deformity studies.

Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria included the following items:
2: letters, conference proceedings, case reports, and cadaveric studies;
Non-English articles;
Clinical trials;
Reviews articles;
Comparison of patients to ACLR with healthy individuals.

Screening process
Firstly, the extracted studies were transferred to the Mendeley Reference Management software and were classified alphabetically. Secondly, duplicate articles were automatically eliminated by the software. Thirdly, the titles and abstracts of the articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourthly, the full text of the articles that did not provide sufficient information on their titles and abstracts were reviewed. As a result, studies that met the eligibility criteria were selected for the systematic review. In case of disagreement about the eligibility of the studies, a meeting was held between the researchers to make a final decision.

Methodological quality assessment and data extraction 
The methodological quality evaluation by the two researchers was independently done through the Downs and Black checklist. The Downs and Black checklist has a good intra-rater (r=0.88) and inter-rater (r=0.75) reliability [19]. The modified checklist consists of 15 questions which are classified as follows: report (questions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 10), external validity (questions 11 and 12), internal validity (questions 16, 18, and 20), and confounder internal validity (items 21, 22 and 25) [18]. The scoring scale is as follows: 1=yes (Y), 0=no (N), and (U)=unable to determine. With the exception of question 5, the letters “Y” (complete=2), “P” (partial=1), and “N” (no=0) were defined as well. Finally, the quality of the articles were classified into 3 categories: low (< 40%), medium (40%-69%), and high quality (≥ 70%) [18]. Two researchers independently extracted the selected articles’ demographic data (authors, year of publication, purpose, sample size, and results). Furthermore, the descriptive characteristics of the participants (age, height, body weight) were extracted. 

3. Results
Study selection

Overall, 457 potentially relevant papers were extracted, of which 154 duplicate articles were removed. Then, the two researchers screened the remaining 303 papers based on the title and abstract, which led to the omission of 245 papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The authors investigated 58 papers in full text and omitted 49 articles because they did not meet at least one of the inclusion criteria. Finally, 9 studies [2, 5, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23] met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review as shown in Figure 1. 

Study characteristics
Table 2 reports the demographic information of the studies. There was a total of 317 patients (women=159 / men=158) with ACLR in 9 study (age: 18 years, height: 174 cm, and weight: 68 kg).

The patients were tested on average 9 months after the surgery. The vGRF data were collected using force plates with 100 to 1920 Hz sampling frequency. The symmetry index was assessed during daily tasks and sports, such as sit-to-stand, walking, jumping-landing, squats, and side-cutting. 

Methodological quality
The average score of the methodological quality of studies was 68.33% (range 54% - 80%), which showed the medium quality of the selected studies. A total of 44.44% of studies (n=4) had high methodological quality [10, 12, 21, 22] and 55.56 % of the studies (n=5) had medium quality [2, 5, 11, 20, 23] (Table 3).
The strength of the quality studies was reported in particular. All studies showed poor external reliability scores (question 12). Also, most studies on the internal validity of the confounder were poor partly. No study that reported patients from the same period was employed. 

Symmetry in vGRF
Overall, the results of 4 studies with medium and 4 studies with high quality reported asymmetric vGRF after ACLR [2, 5, 10, 11, 12, 21, 22, 23]. Only 1 study with medium quality reported no significant difference in symmetry in vGRF [20]. 

4. Discussion
This study investigated the vGRF symmetry in patients with ACLR. The results of this systematic review demonstrated that in patients with ACLR, there is a vGRF asymmetry between the surgical and the non-injured limb. vGRF is reduced in the ACLR limb compared to the healthy limb. Several factors affect the vGRF asymmetry: decreased quadriceps muscle strength, altered neuromuscular function, or fear of re-injury [5, 15, 24]. 
The GRF torque arms are partially affected by the knee flexion angle. Increasing knee flexion commonly enhances the GRF torque arm to the center of the knee joint, and decreases the knee flexion which can lead to increased kinetic asymmetry in the knee joint [5]. In patients with ACLR, fear of movement has been suggested as a factor in utilizing a biomechanical compensatory strategy [11, 24]. Patients with ACLR limit knee flexion to reduce loading on the ACL to avoid injury [24, 25, 26]. This inadequate mechanical loading leads to quadriceps muscle atrophy [27]. The quadriceps muscles, as the primary shock absorber, contract eccentrically during the weight acceptance phase to reduce vGRF action in the lower limbs [15, 28]. 
Evidence suggests that quadriceps muscle strength is associated with vGRF and loading rates in patients with ACLR [15, 29]. Decreased ability of the quadriceps muscles to absorb GRF leads to a stiff landing strategy [28]. This mechanism may reduce the attenuation of mechanical energy through the knee joint active tissue and expose the passive anatomical structures to higher forces, resulting in re-injury of the ACL [20, 28, 30]. In this regard, studies have reported that a soft landing by increasing flexion combined with optimal quadriceps muscle strength is a mechanism for reducing shock [31, 32]. Therefore, quadriceps muscle weakness in the surgical limb cannot tolerate or respond to GRF to maintain an optimal movement pattern [32]. As a result, altered movement strategies in patients with ACLR are somewhat effective in ACL re-injury [5]. 
On the other hand, the results of the studies showed that changes in knee mechanics after ACLR may create knee osteoarthritis by altering cartilage loading patterns in the surgical knee [10]. By reducing knee flexion and consequently reducing the active shock absorption capacity through quadriceps muscle eccentrically contraction, the contact area of the tibiofemoral joint decreases during loading and the shock absorption in passive tissue increases, especially for cartilage in areas not accustomed to such loading [10, 25, 33]. As a result, this mechanism may increase the harmful pressure in the tibiofemoral cartilage contact area and accelerate the development of knee osteoarthritis [34]. In addition, patients with ACLR perform a loading/unloading compensatory mechanism during movement aimed at unloading the surgical limb [12]. Unloading behavior can be a compensatory strategy performed by patients to protect the healing graft [12]. 
The mechanism of unloading and protection of the injured knee may gradually increase the support phase and loading on the healthy limb, which increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis [31, 35] compared with healthy controls. In this regard, studies reported that patients with knee osteoarthritis are exposed to severe and frequent lower limb loading before the stage of osteoarthritis [36]. As a result, overloading and underloading tissue may have negative effects on knee joint health [34]. 

Clinical implications
This study provides a new insight for rehabilitation and orthopedic physicians. The vGRF symmetry assessment can be used as a method to identify compensatory strategies during unilateral and bilateral movements after ACLR or during the rehabilitation period [7]. Therefore, physicians must apply rehabilitation interventions during the end stage of ACL rehabilitation that focus on strategies for kinetics symmetric between the limbs [36]Managing fear of movement and gait retraining through the use of feedback mechanisms with a gradual increase in loading along with interventions, such as strength training for people undergoing ACLR, may be a new treatment option with improved long-term outcomes post-ACLR [2, 11, 12, 24]. As a result, patients undergoing ACLR may need different treatments during rehabilitation with more emphasis on knee load symmetry [38].

Study limitations 
There are several limitations to the literature in this study that affect the strengths of the findings. First, the effect of psychological factors on the kinetic asymmetry of the limb has not been considered in some studies [23]. Second, in some studies, the statistical population included men and women; therefore, the characteristics of the results based on gender are unknown [20]. Third, the low sample size of some studies makes it difficult to generalize the results [11]. Fourth, the nature of cross-sectional studies does not allow an understanding of the cause-and-effect relationships [11]. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers 1) examine vGRF symmetry in prospective studies on bigger sample sizes with gender segregation and 2) investigate the effect of psychological factors on vGRF asymmetry.

5. Conclusion 
The results of the present study show that patients undergoing ACLR adopt abnormal movement patterns, such as decreased knee flexion due to factors, including fear of movement and decreased quadriceps muscle strength. With decreasing knee flexion and weakness of quadriceps muscles, energy absorption by active tissue decreases, and mainly shock absorption by passive tissues increases. As a result, this mechanism leads to re-injury of the ACL graft tissue and tibiofemoral joint cartilage damage. 

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

There were no ethical considerations to be considered in this research.

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors. 

Authors' contributions
All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

We thank Professor Yelfani for guidance in writing this article.

  1. Królikowska A, Czamara A, Reichert P. Between-limb symmetry during double-leg vertical hop landing in males an average of two years after ACL reconstruction is highly correlated with postoperative physiotherapy supervision duration. Appl Sci. 2018; 8(12):2586. [DOI:10.3390/app8122586]
  2. Renner KE, Franck CT, Miller TK, Queen RM. Limb asymmetry during recovery from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2018; 36(7):1887-93. [DOI:10.1002/jor.23853] [PMID]
  3. Saki F, Tahayori B, Bakhtiari Khou S. Female athletes with ligament dominance exhibiting altered hip and ankle muscle co-contraction patterns compared to healthy individuals during single-leg landing. Gait Posture. 2022; 93:225-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.011] [PMID]
  4. Wada O, Gamada K, Aoyama N, Mizuno K, Iwasaki Y. A difference in rotational alignment of the tibio-femoral joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis grafts. Clin Biomech. 2019; 65:45-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.015] [PMID]
  5. Dai B, Butler RJ, Garrett WE, Queen RM. Using ground reaction force to predict knee kinetic asymmetry following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014; 24(6):974-81. [DOI:10.1111/sms.12118] [PMID]
  6. Sharafoddin-Shirazi F, Letafatkar A, Hogg J, Saatchian V. Biomechanical asymmetries persist after ACL reconstruction: Results of a 2-year study. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):86. [DOI:10.1186/s40634-020-00301-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Baumgart C, Schubert M, Hoppe MW, Gokeler A, Freiwald J. Do ground reaction forces during unilateral and bilateral movements exhibit compensation strategies following ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(5):1385-94. [DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3623-7] [PMID]
  8. Baumgart C, Hoppe MW, Freiwald J. Phase-specific ground reaction force analyses of bilateral and unilateral jumps in patients with ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(6): 2325967117710912. [DOI:10.1177/2325967117710912] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Saki F, Anbariyan M, Shafiei H, Bakhtiari S. [Effect of eight weeks of core stability exercises on dynamic balance, function, and strength in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Randomized clinical trial (Persian)]. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2021; 28(12):3313-25. [DOI:10.18502/ssu.v28i12.5778]
  10. Pfeiffer SJ, Blackburn JT, Luc-Harkey B, Harkey MS, Stanley LE, Frank B, et al. Peak knee biomechanics and limb symmetry following unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Associations of walking gait and jump-landing outcomes. Clin Biomech. 2018; 53:79-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.01.020] [PMID]
  11. Tajdini H, Letafatkar A, Brewer BW, Hosseinzadeh M. Association between kinesiophobia and gait asymmetry after acl reconstruction: Implications for prevention of reinjury. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6):3264. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18063264] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Peebles AT, Williams B, Queen RM. Bilateral squatting mechanics are associated with landing mechanics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49(10):2638-44. [DOI:10.1177/03635465211023761] [PMID]
  13. Queen R, Dickerson L, Ranganathan S, Schmitt D. A novel method for measuring asymmetry in kinematic and kinetic variables: The normalized symmetry index. J Biomech. 2020; 99:109531. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109531] [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. Jafarnezhadgero AA, Pourrahimghoroghchi A, Darvishani MA, Aali S, Dionisio VC. Analysis of ground reaction forces and muscle activity in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during different running strike patterns. Gait Posture. 2021; 90:204-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.167] [PMID]
  15. Luc-Harkey BA, Franz JR, Blackburn JT, Padua DA, Hackney AC, Pietrosimone B. Real-time biofeedback can increase and decrease vertical ground reaction force, knee flexion excursion, and knee extension moment during walking in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech. 2018; 76:94-102. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.043] [PMID]
  16. Mantashloo Z, Letafatkar A, Moradi M. Vertical ground reaction force and knee muscle activation asymmetries in patients with ACL reconstruction compared to healthy individuals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(6):2009-14. [DOI:10.1007/s00167-019-05743-5] [PMID]
  17. Sigward SM, Chan MSM, Lin PE, Almansouri SY, Pratt KA. Compensatory strategies that reduce knee extensor demand during a bilateral squat change from 3 to 5 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 48(9):672-734. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2018.7977] [PMID]
  18. Yalfani A, Ahmadi M, Asgarpoor A. [Investigate the plantar pressure distribution in PFP patients: A systematic review (Persian)]. J Res Sport Rehabil. 2022; 9(17):73-83. https://rsr.basu.ac.ir/article_4445.html?lang=en
  19. Barton CJ, Levinger P, Menz HB, Webster KE. Kinematic gait characteristics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009; 30(4):405-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.109] [PMID]
  20. Aizawa J, Ohji S, Hirohata K, Ohmi T, Koga H, Yagishita K. Relationship between asymmetrical jump-landing impact and quadriceps strength after unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Med Rehabil Res. 2019; 4(3):1-6. [DOI:10.15761/PMRR.1000203]
  21. Ithurburn MP, Paterno MV., Thomas S, Pennell ML, Evans KD, Magnussen RA, et al. Change in drop-landing mechanics over 2 years in young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47(11):2608-16. [DOI:10.1177/0363546519864688] [PMID]
  22. Chan MS, Sigward SM. Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice underloading strategies during daily activity. J Orthop Res. 2022; 40(3):565-72. [DOI:10.1002/jor.25070] [PMID]
  23. Labanca L, Laudani L, Menotti F, Rocchi J, Mariani PP, Giombini A, et al. Asymmetrical lower extremity loading early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a significant predictor of asymmetrical loading at the time of return to sport. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 95(4):248-55. [DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000369] [PMID]
  24. Luc-Harkey BA, Franz JR, Losina E, Pietrosimone B. Association between kinesiophobia and walking gait characteristics in physically active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Gait Posture. 2018; 64:220-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.029] [PMID] [PMCID]
  25. Ithurburn MP, Thomas S, Paterno MV, Schmitt LC. Young athletes after ACL reconstruction with asymmetric quadriceps strength at the time of return-to-sport clearance demonstrate drop-landing asymmetries two years later. Knee. 2021; 29:520-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2021.02.036] [PMID] [PMCID]
  26. Ohji S, Aizawa J, Hirohata K, Ohmi T, Mitomo S, Jinno T, et al. Characteristics of landing impact in athletes who have not returned to sports at the pre-injury competition level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2021; 25:47-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
  27. Luc-Harkey BA, Franz JR, Hackney AC, Blackburn JT, Padua DA, Pietrosimone B. Lesser lower extremity mechanical loading associates with a greater increase in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein following walking in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech. 2018; 60:13-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.024] [PMID]
  28. Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Heyl R, Hewett TE. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007; 17(4):258-62. [DOI:10.1097/JSM.0b013e31804c77ea] [PMID]
  29. Pua YH, Mentiplay BF, Clark RA, Ho JY. Associations among quadriceps strength and rate of torque development 6 weeks post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and future hop and vertical jump performance: A prospective cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 47(11):817-87. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2017.7133] [PMID]
  30. Kean CO, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Lim BW, Bennell KL. Impact loading following quadriceps strength training in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus alignment. Clin Biomech. 2017; 42:20-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.002] [PMID]
  31. De Oliveira Silva D, Briani RV, Pazzinatto MF, Ferrari D, Aragão FA, De Azevedo FM. Reduced knee flexion is a possible cause of increased loading rates in individuals with patellofemoral pain. Clin Biomech. 2015; 30(9):971-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.06.021] [PMID]
  32. Hoshiba T, Nakata H, Saho Y, Kanosue K, Fukubayashi T. Anteroposterior ground reaction force as an indicator of gait alteration during treadmill walking after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Phys Fitness Sports Med. 2016; 5(1):95-103. [DOI:10.7600/jpfsm.5.95]
  33. Ahmadi M, Yalfani A. Do patellofemoral pain patients have higher loading rate compared to healthy indivalues? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Treat Phys Ther. 2022; 12(1):13-22. [DOI:10.32598/ptj.12.1.442.2]
  34. Davis HC, Luc-Harkey BA, Seeley MK, Troy Blackburn J, Pietrosimone B. Sagittal plane walking biomechanics in individuals with knee osteoarthritis after quadriceps strengthening. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019; 27(5):771-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.026] [PMID] [PMCID]
  35. Stensdotter AK, Guerra JB, Häger-Ross C. Limb support in response to balance provocations in women with patellofemoral pain. Adv Physiother. 2009; 11(2):97-103. [DOI:10.1080/14038190802425575]
  36. Yalfani A, Ahmadi M, Gandomi F, Bigdeli N. [An investigation of the lower extremity kinematics during stair ambulation in people with âpatellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review (Persian)]. J Paramed Sci Rehabil. 2021; 9(4):115-25. http://eprints.mums.ac.ir/37690/
  37. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(8):553-9. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2011.3591] [PMID]
  38. Malafronte J, Hannon J, Goto S, Singleton SB, Dietrich L, Garrison JC, et al. Limb dominance influences energy absorption contribution (EAC) during landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport. 2021; 50:42-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.015] [PMID]

Type of Study: Review Paper | Subject: Knee surgery
Received: 2022/04/21 | Accepted: 2022/07/3 | Published: 2022/02/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb