Volume 5, Issue 3 (8-2018)                   J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2018, 5(3): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khalsa A S, Mundis G M M, Ledesma J B, Hosseini P, Bruffey J D, Nguyen S N, et al . Radiographic and Surgical Outcomes After Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2018; 5 (3)
URL: http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-240-en.html
1- San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California, United States
2- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, United States
Full-Text [PDF 116 kb]   (641 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1093 Views)
Full-Text:   (4563 Views)
Copyright © 2018, Shafa Orthopedic Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Teraguchi M, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Yamada H, Oka H, Minamide A, et al. Progression, incidence, and risk factors for intervertebral disc degeneration in a longitudinal population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(7):1122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.01.001. [PubMed: 28089899].
  • 2. Farshad-Amacker NA, Farshad M, Winklehner A, Andreisek G. MR imaging of degenerative disc disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(9):1768-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.002. [PubMed: 26094867].
  • 3. Kanna RM, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Patterns of lumbar disc degeneration are different in degenerative disc disease and disc prolapse magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 224 patients. Spine J. 2014;14(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.042. [PubMed: 24231779].
  • 4. Bisschop A, Kingma I, Bleys RL, van der Veen AJ, Paul CP, van Dieen JH, et al. Which factors prognosticate rotational instability following lumbar laminectomy? Eur Spine J. 2013;22(12):2897-903. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3002-3. [PubMed: 24043337]. [PubMed Central: PMC3843774].
  • 5. Guha D, Heary RF, Shamji MF. Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(4). E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15259. [PubMed: 26424349].
  • 6. Ozgur BM, Hughes SA, Baird LC, Taylor WR. Minimally disruptive decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.019. [PubMed: 16413444].
  • 7. Johnson RD, Valore A, Villaminar A, Comisso M, Balsano M. Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(4):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.032. [PubMed: 23375396].
  • 8. Palejwala SK, Sheen WA, Walter CM, Dunn JH, Baaj AA. Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion using a stand-alone construct for the treatment of adjacent segment disease of the lumbar spine: review of the literature and report of three cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;124:90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.06.031. [PubMed: 25019458].
  • 9. Tohmeh AG, Khorsand D, Watson B, Zielinski X. Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(26):E1582-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000645. [PubMed: 25341985].
  • 10. Karikari IO, Nimjee SM, Hardin CA, Hughes BD, Hodges TR, Mehta AI, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion approach for isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases: initial clinical experience and early outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(6):368-75. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ffefd2. [PubMed: 21150667].
  • 11. von Keudell A, Alimi M, Gebhard H, Hartl R. Adult Degenerative Scoliosis with Spinal Stenosis Treated with Stand-Alone Cage via an Extreme Lateral Transpsoas Approach; a Case Report and Literature Review. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(2):124-9. [PubMed: 26110180]. [PubMed Central: PMC4468624].
  • 12. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:456346. doi: 10.1100/2012/456346. [PubMed: 22545019]. [PubMed Central: PMC3324177].
  • 13. Udby PM, Bech-Azeddine R. Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: A pilot study and a literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;133:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008. [PubMed: 25855474].
  • 14. Ahmadian A, Bach K, Bolinger B, Malham GM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS, et al. Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: multicenter clinical outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(4):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.036. [PubMed: 25684343].
  • 15. Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M, Pejrona M, Buric J, Ismael M, et al. Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2015;24 Suppl 3:369-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3929-7. [PubMed: 25893332].
  • 16. Kretzer RM, Molina C, Hu N, Umekoji H, Baaj AA, Serhan H, et al. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(7):E336-43. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182868ef9. [PubMed: 27137151].
  • 17. Choi KC, Ryu KS, Lee SH, Kim YH, Lee SJ, Park CK. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-220. [PubMed: 23890389]. [PubMed Central: PMC3726285].
  • 18. Wang SH, Celic I, Choi SY, Riccomagno M, Wang Q, Sun LO, et al. Dlg5 regulates dendritic spine formation and synaptogenesis by controlling subcellular N-cadherin localization. J Neurosci. 2014;34(38):12745-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1280-14.2014. [PubMed: 25232112]. [PubMed Central: PMC4166160].
  • 19. Watkins R IV, Watkins R III, Hanna R. Non-:union: rate with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(29). e275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000275. [PubMed: 25546670]. [PubMed Central: PMC4602616].
  • 20. Nemani VM, Aichmair A, Taher F, Lebl DR, Hughes AP, Sama AA, et al. Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(5):E326-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000141. [PubMed: 24299718].
  • 21. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS. Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2015;24 Suppl 3:414-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3844-y. [PubMed: 25739988].
  • 22. Malham GM, Ellis NJ, Parker RM, Blecher CM, White R, Goss B, et al. Maintenance of Segmental Lordosis and Disk Height in Stand-alone and Instrumented Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(2):E90-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa4c94. [PubMed: 28207620].
  • 23. Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Nathan ST, Pawar V, Eismann EA, Sturm PF, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(2):E113-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae3d0. [PubMed: 23124268].
  • 24. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(1):110-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319. [PubMed: 23662890].
Subject: Knee surgery
Received: 2019/09/9 | Accepted: 2018/08/15 | Published: 2018/08/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb