google-site-verification=woR2hWf-QnPYIoZrOTnR0gUqhtUgbamY8cuPoAkLkpw Complications and Radiological Findings in One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision Surgery for Complex Degenerative Spinal Deformities - Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science
Volume 12, Issue 1 (Winter 2025)                   JROS 2025, 12(1): 57-64 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Chehrassan M, Nikouei F, Shakeri M, Azarnia G, Ahmadi R, Ghavidel E, et al . Complications and Radiological Findings in One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision Surgery for Complex Degenerative Spinal Deformities. JROS 2025; 12 (1) :57-64
URL: http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2291-en.html
1- Department of Orthopedics, Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Orthopedics, Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. & Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shafayahyaeian Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (212 Views)
Background: Revision long-segment posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for complex degenerative spinal deformity is technically demanding and associated with significant perioperative risks. Whether a one-stage or two-stage strategy yields superior outcomes remains controversial. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare radiologic outcomes, perioperative parameters, and complication rates between one-stage and two-stage revision of long-segment PSF.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who underwent revision long-segment PSF at our tertiary center between 2021 and 2023. Patients were divided into one-stage (n=29) and two-stage (n=16) groups. Demographic, perioperative, and imaging parameters, as well as complication rates, were compared between groups. 
Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in sagittal and coronal alignment, with no statistically significant differences in radiologic outcomes. Operative time (P=0.038) and hemoglobin drop (P=0.001) were significantly greater in the two-stage group. Hospital stay tended to be longer in staged procedures, though the difference was not statistically significant. Overall complication rates were comparable between the groups (48.3% vs 37.5%, P=0.544), with infection being the most common complication in both groups (17.2% vs 18.7%).
Conclusion: One-stage and two-stage revision long-segment PSF achieved comparable radiologic outcomes and complication rates. However, the one-stage approach was associated with shorter operative time and reduced hemoglobin drop. These findings suggest that single-stage revision surgery may provide favorable perioperative outcomes without compromising safety.
Full-Text [PDF 525 kb]   (69 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (57 Views)  
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Spine surgery
Received: 2024/06/22 | Accepted: 2024/11/23 | Published: 2025/02/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb