Volume 12, Issue 3 (Summer 2025)
JROS 2025, 12(3): 121-136 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ashoury H, Yalfani A. The Role of Water Kinetic Chain Exercises in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction of Gluteus Medius and Quadratus Lumborum Muscles in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JROS 2025; 12 (3) :121-136
URL: http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2297-en.html
URL: http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2297-en.html
1- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
2- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
Abstract: (13 Views)
Background: The gluteus medius (GMed) and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles play crucial roles in stabilizing the pelvis and spine, yet their activation may be compromised in individuals with low back pain. Water exercises have shown promise in enhancing muscle function and coordination.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of water kinetic chain exercises in improving maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the targeted muscles in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).
Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled sixty men aged 40–60 years with CNSLBP. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: water-based open kinetic chain exercises (WOKCe), water-based closed kinetic chain exercises (WCKCe), and a no-intervention control group. Surface EMG assessed MVIC, with electrodes positioned over the QL (about 2–3 cm lateral toward the L3 spinous process) during lateral trunk flexion and over the GMed (at the midpoint between the greater trochanter and the iliac crest) during hip abduction. Between-group differences were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after eight weeks of intervention (three sessions per week).
Results: ANCOVA revealed significant improvements in MVIC for both experimental groups compared to controls (P<0.05). For GMed MVIC, both aquatic exercise groups demonstrated significant improvements (F=7.08, P=0.002, η²=0.212) with high statistical power (0.917). Similarly, for QL MVIC, both intervention groups showed substantial enhancements (F=12.94, P=0.001, η²=0.316) with excellent statistical power (0.996). Post-hoc analyses confirmed that both WCKCe and WOKCe groups achieved comparable improvements in both muscle groups, with no significant differential effects between the two intervention modalities.
Conclusion: Both the WOKCe and WCKCe interventions resulted in significant enhancements in MVIC of the GMed QL muscles. These results suggest that either intervention can be effectively integrated into clinical and rehabilitation practices to improve muscle function and stability in individuals with chronic low back pain. This underscores the potential for tailored therapeutic strategies to optimize patient outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of water kinetic chain exercises in improving maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the targeted muscles in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).
Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled sixty men aged 40–60 years with CNSLBP. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: water-based open kinetic chain exercises (WOKCe), water-based closed kinetic chain exercises (WCKCe), and a no-intervention control group. Surface EMG assessed MVIC, with electrodes positioned over the QL (about 2–3 cm lateral toward the L3 spinous process) during lateral trunk flexion and over the GMed (at the midpoint between the greater trochanter and the iliac crest) during hip abduction. Between-group differences were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after eight weeks of intervention (three sessions per week).
Results: ANCOVA revealed significant improvements in MVIC for both experimental groups compared to controls (P<0.05). For GMed MVIC, both aquatic exercise groups demonstrated significant improvements (F=7.08, P=0.002, η²=0.212) with high statistical power (0.917). Similarly, for QL MVIC, both intervention groups showed substantial enhancements (F=12.94, P=0.001, η²=0.316) with excellent statistical power (0.996). Post-hoc analyses confirmed that both WCKCe and WOKCe groups achieved comparable improvements in both muscle groups, with no significant differential effects between the two intervention modalities.
Conclusion: Both the WOKCe and WCKCe interventions resulted in significant enhancements in MVIC of the GMed QL muscles. These results suggest that either intervention can be effectively integrated into clinical and rehabilitation practices to improve muscle function and stability in individuals with chronic low back pain. This underscores the potential for tailored therapeutic strategies to optimize patient outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Keywords: Low back pain, Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), Kinetic chain, Gluteus medius (GMed), Quadratus lumborum (QL)
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Spine surgery
Received: 2025/01/12 | Accepted: 2025/04/21 | Published: 2025/08/1
Received: 2025/01/12 | Accepted: 2025/04/21 | Published: 2025/08/1
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
